From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, James Strachan wrote: > > > ----- Cut Here ----- > > I vote as follows on moving Jelly to the Commons Proper: > > [X] +1 - I support this move and am willing to help > > I will add this to the set of commons packages I build nightly, and to the > "commons-combo" package (that builds a combined JAR/Javadocs for all the > released jakarta-commons libraries). > > Although, I'm beginning to wonder if subproject/project status might be > better. Jelly core looks like it's becoming a framework with lots of > optional packages (and their associated dependencies) on top of it, very > reminiscent of Ant ...
Agreed. I think we need a small Jelly core, with few dependencies and then seperate optional packages. We can always make a "jelly-combo" JAR like "commons-combo" with all the different packages combined into a single jar for those that want it. James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
