On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > >>>To be honest, I'm not convinced we need two classes. DateUtils so far > >>>looks like DateFormatUtils to me. If those methods were kept, they do make > >>>more sense in CalendarUtils. > >>> > >>>Hen > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>What's DateFormatUtils? Is this a proposed class or something that > >>already exists? > >> > >> > > > >My fault. I meant, it seems concerned with DateFormats and not Dates. > > > >Hen > > > > > Hen, > > Still a bit confused. Are you saying that DateUtils (as it stands now > in CVS) might be more appropriately named DateFormatUtils? Or that it > resembles java.text.DateFormat? The former. I see very little in there [phase of moon aside] that isn't really a wrapper around the DateFormat concept. In fact, we should be suspicious of a DateUtils as java.util.Date is really just a milli-second-based instant in time. Hen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
