Hey Scott, I think the point of the functors proposal was that functors seemed significant enough to warrant their own component. Also functors are pretty wide of lang's "java.lang and java.lang-like functionality" scope. However it looks like the functor vote didn't succeed, so functors will probably end up in lang by default, unless it is vetoed.
- Morgan --- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Vote +1 to the vote for that and it could be ;) > > .. > > sorry. hard to resist :) > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: > > > Why couldn't this just be in the next version of > lang? > > -- > > Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ===== Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
