Thanks to all for your votes. Maybe now I'll stop posting so many messages to community@ and get to work on [codec]. :-)
I've got karma to jakarta-commons, but not to jakarta-commons-sandbox. -------- Tim O'Brien PS: ...to commiters who don't follow community@, this map is very interesting: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msg No=1334 > -----Original Message----- > From: Rodney Waldhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 5:55 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [new committer] (was Re: [VOTE] Tim O'Brien as a Committer) > > > +1 as well. > > That's at least 4 by my count. Assuming no -1s are pending, > welcome aboard Tim. > > Per the instructions at > <http://incubator.apache.org/drafts/newcommitters.html>, I'm > cc'ing root@apache and pmc@jakarta. Can someone hook Tim up > with an account? > > You can find this nomination/vote thread at > <http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=commons > [EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=23520>. > > (The thread link is actually > <http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/BrowseList?listName=comm > [EMAIL PROTECTED]&by=thread&from=315127>, > but that pulls in some extra stuff. > > Tim, as you probably already know, you should fill out the > form at > <http://incubator.apache.org/forms/ASF_Contributor_License_2_f > orm.pdf> and fax (or mail) it in. > > Thanks all. > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > I don't think we should submit these patches. Instead I > would like to > > nominate Tim O'Brien as a Jakarta Commons commiter. > > > > He has been supplying patches to the Codec project for the last 4 > > months [at least], has refactored much of the existing > Codec code and > > is the one involved with Codec with the best vision for Codec's > > future. > > > > There has been increasing interest in the Codec project > over the last > > few months, and it needs someone to be focusing on it. Tim has been > > contributing to the Apache community's mail lists for a > while now and > > I believe is ready. > > > > [best i can get the mailing list to spew out is: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=103738082600002&r=1&w=2 > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=103763510400004&r=1&w=2 > > ] > > > > Hen > > > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote: > > > > > Here is a patch to fix CRLF problems in Soundex.java. > > > > > > I'm going to submit a few patches in the next couple of > days, I'll > > > hit the "low hanging fruit" first, and move on to patches after > > > that. > > > > > > If you are interested, > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?action=edit&id=CodecPro > > > jectPage > > > s shows a little list of thoughts for Codec. If you've > got input, (and I > > > know that people have had input in the past), let's start > s discussion > > > either on this list or on that page. > > > > > > I'm going to submit a few patches in the next couple of > days, I'll > > > hit the low hanging fruit first, and move on to patches > after that. > > > Right now, I've got a patch from Iulian that needs some > looking at, > > > and some old submissions from Kyle Burton. > > > > > > -------- > > > Tim O'Brien > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Rodney Waldhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 6:34 AM > > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > > Subject: RE: Wiki and [codec] > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see one: > > > > > > > > > > Jan 20 Iulian Musat (11,350) [Sandbox] [Codec] > [PATCH] Base64 > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll try to take a look. > > > > > > > > > Plus a patch that Tim himself was reworking because > it was cvs > > > > > clashing with a change of yours Rodney. > > > > > > > > I'm not sure what this one is. I haven't touched anything in > > > > codec since Nov 18 of last year. > > > > > > > > > Hen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On a related note, [codec] is languishing. We've had two > > > > > > > code submissions that haven't been taken up in recent > > > > months. I think > > > > > > > it might be time for a repolishing of the proposal. My > > > > DayJob is > > > > > > > 24/7 these days, but I'll take a crack at a > project plan in > > > > > > > the coming week if no one else steps up to the plate. > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim, if you can point me to the patches that fell > through the > > > > > > cracks, and even better, endorse them as reasonable and > > > > tested, I'd > > > > > > be more than happy to take a look. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > --- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]