--- "Mark R. Diggory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim O'Brien wrote:Why not just retain them locally?
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Mark R. Diggory wrote:I want to retain the content/examples for my proposed changes, is it acceptable to start another directory or should I tag and create a cvs branch with the proposed changes in it?
Phil Steitz wrote:I also try to adhere to this practice, but let's all agree not to call
--- "Mark R. Diggory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I'm sorry, I'm not really talking about the spec, just a general trend in design of Java Beans that I've observed and kinda been "trained" to do. So, if its against the spec even, I suspect I should change my view-point.
Univariate implementations "JavaBeans" (even though we are going to derive benefits from using the getXXX() syntax).
Mark, let me know when you've come to a stopping point, and I'll move source to the proposed packages.
Is there a Jakarta policy on this kind of thing?
Because if one is a commiter, one can use the cvs branching mechanism to approach prototyping. if a prototype implmentation is ever approved it can be merged into the trunk. Providing it in the cvs opens it up easily to review by other developers simply by checking out that particular branch. Yes, I also wonder if there is a Jakarta Policy on such a thing.
-Mark
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
