DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20844>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20844 [math] alternative root finding framework and Brent-Dekker solver [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-17 21:22 ------- Because there was no overlap with the existing code, I've applied these patches to the codebase as I think it will make the debate easier to manage. If we find this framework unacceptable we can easily rollback. I've got a few issues immediately: 1. It didn't compile as submitted. BrentSolver referenced xtol - THIS IS IMPORTANT - you need to go in and fix BrentSolver (line 109) it used to reference a missing variable xtol, I've changed this to tolerance which is most likely wrong. Also, there were missing parantheses. 2. MathException - I'm not so sure, but I am for throwing a checked exception during root finding. I just don't want to create an exception hierarchy just because we can. 3. The tests as submitted do not run successfully. This may be relates to #1. Essentially, I view this commit as preliminary, let the discussion begin. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
