Stephen, I was just going to remark that some *Utils classes are final and some others are not; and propose to clean that up but... this is intentional then? For backwards compatibility I take it.
We could javadoc these non-final classes as to be made final in the next release...? IMHO, subclassing a class (like our *Utils) that only contains statics is asking for trouble since there is no static side inheritance like there is in Smalltalk, but... different story. ;-) Gary -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 16:12 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] Findbugs output for Lang 2.0 I've addressed these as seems sensible. Some static variables went from protected to private Some static variables went from non-final to final Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:54 PM Subject: [lang] Findbugs output for Lang 2.0 > > Taking current CVS I get the following as output from the Findbugs > project. > > Lang output: http://www.flamefew.net/~hen/lang-2.0-findbugs-output.html > Findbugs: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/bugs/ > > > Just in case anyone's interested :) > > Hen > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
