Ditto. But in the case of Latka and HttpClient, I expect anything checked into CVS to be using CVS.
Still need to sort them out. The HttpClient cvs diffs could just be something daft like a bad line ending, but if so then it's confusing cvs enough to suggest everything is different. I'll mess around with the -b options to diff etc to see if it's just dos/unix formatting. Hen On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is this a definite rule? > > Is there somewhere it's mandated? > > I'm asking as I don't remember it being required. > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > > > > "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/11/2003 02:29:18 PM: > > > > I assume you are talking about the docs at > > > /www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/. The HttpClient site is > > > not maintained in CVS. It is generated via Maven and published with > > > maven site:deploy. > > > > As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out > into > > the file system. Amongst the reasons for this are to ensure that > > infrastructure can recover them rapidly in the event of a problem. This > > includes sites generated by Forrest or Maven. > > > > --- Noel > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
