BTW: MutableString is a bad name as it can imply a class that holds a Stringand has a getString and setString method.
Stephen
Can you tell us why the name MutableString implies it has a getString and setString.
And what do people think here of introducing a different term (say Strand) for this concept as I discussed earlier (I paste that here, last time it was buried under confusion due to a typo.)
" Talking about name, I would add my opinion that while it might be nice to have a name for the replacer that is much like the replacee, (StringBuf) one might prefer a more descriptive name at the expense of this convenience: (*** MutableString).
As a compromise between the two, the name Strand can be adopted (Str... thus near the original one + can be defined to represent a mutable string contrasted with "String" which, by virtue of the so-named class in the API, is immutable.) "
Ash
---------------------------------------------
Run, rabbit run. Dig that hole, forget the sun, And when at last the work is done Don't sit down it's time to dig another one.
_________________________________________________________________
Our best dial-up offer is back. Get MSN Dial-up Internet Service for 6 months @ $9.95/month now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]