Re: [cache] project status query...To be honest, I think an abstraction versus yet another implmentation would be more useful. Currently I can count off maybe 10 or 15 different implementations of caching, all a bit different.. Unless commons cache has something that makes it special, I wouldn't be inclined to use it as yet another implementation.
For ideas on abstracting a cache, check out how Hibernate does it. Being able to work with multiple different types of cache's was one of the big features in 2.1. Eric -----Original Message----- From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:09 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [cache] project status query... I suggested a new orientation for [cache] earlier this month but it hasn't received much feedback : http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg31432.html The idea was to turn it into an abstraction layer for cache implementations just like commons logging for logging implementations. Any thought on this ? Emmanuel Bourg Hernan Silberman wrote: > I'm interested to know the status of the cache sandbox project. Looks very > nice, I'd like to know if it's being actively worked on and how mature the code > is. I noticed there are no builds available and not much documentation yet so I > thought I'd ask the list. > > thanks! > Hernan > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
