On 28.12.2003 20:34:05 Stephen Colebourne wrote: > From: "__matthewHawthorne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>Packages o.a.c.io.input and o.a.c.io.output > > >>---------------------------------------------------------------- > > OK, then perhaps io.streams is the best place. However, I believe that > > Henri preferred leaving the classes split between io.input and > > io.output. Henri, can you chime in and give us the reason for your > > opinion on this again? > I also support input and output (as is), as they just seem like an obvious > classification. Is there any real need for them to be together? > [collections] has suffered by putting things in one place when they should > have been split.
I'm also totally ok with leaving everything as is. > > Also, what are the opinions on renaming IOUtils to IoUtils? I think > > there's a guideline in "Elements of Java Style" that suggests > > capitalizing acronyms in this way. > I wouldn't change from IOUtils, it just looks right. I agree. > Actually, you might want to consider InputUtils and OutputUtils instead. > Again, this seems like the obvious classification. Going through IOUtils I don't quite see how the methods would be separated in these two classes. Any ideas? Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
