DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26922>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26922 [lang] public static boolean DateUtils.equals(Date dt1, Date dt2) ? ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-16 09:31 ------- Yes, I agree with you. And I propose the code to do this : /** * <p>Compares two Dates, returning <code>true</code> if they are equal.</p> * * <p><code>null</code>s are handled without exceptions. Two <code>null</code> * references are considered to be equal.</p> * * <pre> * long now = System.currentTimeMillis(); * java.util.Date date = new java.util.Date(now); * java.sql.Timestamp timestamp = new java.sql.Timestamp(now); * DateUtils.equals(null, null) = true * DateUtils.equals(null, date) = false * DateUtils.equals(date, null) = false * DateUtils.equals(date, date) = true * DateUtils.equals(date, timestamp) = true * </pre> * * @see java.util.Date#equals(Object) * @param dt1 the first Date, may be null * @param dt2 the second Date, may be null * @return <code>true</code> if the Dates are equal or both <code>null</code> */ public static boolean equals(Date dt1, Date dt2) { return (dt1 == null ? dt2 == null : dt1.getTime() == dt2.getTime ()); } --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
