The only delta I see b/w LICENCE.txt in [lang] and [collections] is that the [collections] version has one extra blank line at the top which http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt does not have.
Both files use CRLF as far as I can tell. One space after the * makes sense to me. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 17:46 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] is Apache License 2.0 compliant. > > The LICENSE.txt file differs between [lang] and [collections]. Seems to be > a > line ending thing. We should try to make them the same one way or other. > > Also (less significant) [lang] and [collections] now differ in the license > slightly. [lang] uses 1 space in the java comment as an indent. > [collections] uses 2 spaces. I prefer the 1 space, so I suggest we try and > use that generally. In XML licenses there is also a difference in > spacing/indenting. > > (I didn't do the build files in [collections], but I suppose they are > covered too :-0 ) > > Stephen > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary Gregory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hello all, > > > > [lang] is Apache License 2.0 compliant by the page > > http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html. > > > > If I've missing some, please let me know. > > > > What I've missed on purpose: > > > > - The manifest (.MF) file. Can MF files have comments? I do not see them > > spec'd here: > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/jar/jar.html#JAR%20Manifest > > > > Thanks, > > Gary > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
