Hola, >Yes, it would be good to maintain acceptable html in javadoc. Yet, I'd >like to point out that javadoc isn't java code. while we would like to >maintain lots of it to help our users understand it, the library works >just fine without it.
But if you do have it, it's be nice if it were in a human-friendly browsing format, given that it's intended for humans and that most of them use the HTML JavaDocs ;) >>5) Is double suitable for these calculations? Should the strictfp flag be >>used? (I have no idea as to the answer, but I have to ask) >> >Neither do I. Can anyone enlighten us? You probably want strictfp: http://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=17544. >>6) ComplexFormat doesn't extend the JDK Format class You didn't address this issue. ? >implementation is designed such that it reads each url/file twice makes >doing this not possible. Out of curiosity, why read each url/file twice? Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]