> I hadn't realized there was one -- do you have a pointer? However, > if using that requires a dependency on Groovy, then I'd want to wait > until Groovy hits 1.0. My sense is that it's still prone to a lot of > change.
I can't really attest to it. But I did notice it a little while ago. I don't think there's a lot there, just an approach (but that template engine abstraction is pretty straight forward). I don't think we should depend on groovy, I was simply suggesting approaching it a similar way. > > Mike, do you know that your e-mail is timestamped one day ahead? Is > that your way of staying on the cutting edge? ;^) HAHA! That's awesome. I did not know this. In fact, I was complaining last night when I thought my clock was 5 minutes slow. Turns out it was 23 hours and 55 minutes fast :-) Time to investigate where my NTP daemon went... Thanks for the heads up. - Mike > > Joe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
