I thought we were going to make the default behaviour of that method to write the object.toString() to the output?
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:13:25 +0200, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Done that, thanks for the precision. I was unclear from the last mails. > I feared for a while at the amount of checkstyle complaints... did > anyone pay attention to them ? It seems quite of an annoying task! > Maybe it would be simper to relax the requirements ? > > paul > > Le 28 oct. 04, à 21:23, Dion Gillard a écrit : > > > > > I think we agreed it would be a good addition, and that the name > > should be objectData. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
