I thought the standard way to handle this is to guard the log statements with checks if the log level is enabled like:
if (isFineEnabled()) logFine(anyObject1 + "any string" + anyObject2); which already is possible with LoggerFacade. This would make the extension obsolete... Oliver On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:19:13 +0100, Stefan Lützkendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Oliver, > > I would like to improve the LoggerFacade interface with methods like, > > logFiner(String message, Object param1); > logFiner(String message, Object param1, Object param2); > logFine(String message, Object param1); > ... > > to avoid the frequently used calls like > logFine(anyObject1 + "any string" + anyObject2); > > This would reduce the overhead if logging is disabled. > > Changing the interfaces before the first release would be good, I think. > What do you think? > > Regards, Stefan > > -- > Stefan Lützkendorf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
