+/-0 for giving site "tags", "branches", and "trunk".  It might be nice
to have the site built from site/tags/PRODUCTION so we could have some
sort of a release cycle for the site, but (OTOH) it might be nice to
keep it simple and just have content under site.

Anyone?

Tim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 11:56 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Martin Cooper
> Subject: Re: Volunteer for SVN migration management? Was: 
> Migrate to SVN?
> 
> From a Jakarta level view, I really want to push for:
> 
> jakarta/<subproject>/<whatever...>
> 
> Other than that, I'll work with anything :)
> 
> (Which I just noticed Velocity haven't done, so will see if I 
> can get them to change).
> 
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:52:22 -0800, Martin Cooper 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 00:35:14 -0500, Tim O'Brien 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > I'm available if you need help.
> > 
> > Thanks, I appreciate that.
> > 
> > > One thing to flesh out is structure - here are some proposals:
> > 
> > Summarising my preferred versions of your alternatives, we 
> might have:
> > 
> > jakarta/
> >   commons/
> >     proper/
> >       ...
> >       digester/
> >         branches/
> >         tags/
> >         trunk/
> >       ...
> >     site/
> >       branches/
> >       tags/
> >       trunk/
> >     sandbox/
> >       ...
> >       bzip2/
> >         branches/
> >         tags/
> >         trunk/
> >       ...
> > 
> > This gives each component its own branches and tags, which 
> makes more 
> > sense to me than having Commons-wide tagging and branching. As 
> > mentioned, it also makes 'site' its own thing, rather than 
> pretending 
> > that it's a component.
> > 
> > Comments?
> > 
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Commons Proper Components
> > >
> > > 1. /jakarta/commons/digester/[tags|branches|trunk]
> > > 2. /jakarta/commons/proper/digester/[tags|branches|trunk]
> > >
> > > Commons Sandbox Components (just using bzip2 because it is there)
> > >
> > > 1. /jakarta/commons-sandbox/bzip2/[tags|branches|trunk]
> > > 2. /jakarta/commons/sandbox/bzip2/[tags|branches|trunk]
> > >
> > > Anybody have other options?
> > >
> > > I look at the existing velocity project, and part of me 
> just wishes 
> > > they had combined all velocity related "modules" under a 
> velocity directory.
> > > If everything "commons" where under a commons directory, then we 
> > > could have a separate directory for the commons site - something 
> > > like /jakarta/commons/site.  "site" would then not be a 
> sibling to a 
> > > real project.
> > >
> > > Tim "2 cents" O'Brien
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 11:11 PM
> > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Henri Yandell
> > > > Subject: Re: Volunteer for SVN migration management? 
> Was: Migrate 
> > > > to
> > > SVN?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:31:27 -0500, Henri Yandell 
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Do we have a volunteer to organise the move of Commons to SVN?
> > > >
> > > > Sure, I'll step up, unless someone else has a strong 
> desire to do it.
> > > >
> > > > > (which is probably some combination of: vote, plan, 
> liaise with
> > > infra)
> > > >
> > > > Yep, I expect I'll be doing all three at once. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Cooper
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hen
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:54:37 -0500, Phil Steitz 
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > +1 from me as well -- seems to make sense to move 
> as a group.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Phil
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>>> 6) should I just delete the 
> > > > > > >>>> /jakarta-commons-sandbox/email directory, or leave the 
> > > > > > >>>> folder and a note pointing to the promotion?  What
> > > > about the
> > > > > > >>>> website as well?  I think for [configuration] we just 
> > > > > > >>>> deleted
> > > > both.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> The ideal scenario would be to use "cvs delete" 
> on all the
> > > sandbox
> > > > > > >>> files, so that the original history is 
> maintained there, 
> > > > > > >>> but
> > > > nobody
> > > > > > >>> who checks out the sandbox (with "-dP" at least) will be
> > > bothered
> > > > by
> > > > > > >>> the files.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The IDEAL situation would be to convert Jakarta 
> Commons to SVN.
> > > > Can we
> > > > > > >> PLEASE consider doing so?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> A lot of projects, including the HTTP Server 
> project, have 
> > > > > > >> been migrating, as can be seen from 
> > > > > > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.  Jakarta and
> > > XML
> > > > are
> > > > > > >> definitely the laggards now.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>     --- Noel
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --
> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > -
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ---
> > >
> > >
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to