> test runs now Great work! Will surely help me a lot.
> fixed a couple of small things: need to match on singular property type > in the test for polymorphism. (possible may need to add an extra null > test and then check property type in some cases. no time to create unit > tests to prove or disprove this now.) also, tweaked the element name > matching code in the property descriptor. What do you mean with singular property type ? A common base type different from Object ? > an important thing to remember is that betwixt (right or wrong) does not > assign adders automatically when using a dot betwixt file. you need to > either use addDefaults or add an updater property. this behaviour has > been like this for a while and is a FAQ. maybe it needs changing but > that then there'd be no way to indicate no updater should be used. Mhmm, this auto-determination of an adder/updater would be really nice to have. What's the reason somebody want's no updater ? If this is for read-only properties, then some property like "readonly" might do ? Btw, does this new reference/collection behaviour affect the addDefaults stuff ? regards, Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
