> "Graphs", however,
> have an entirely different meaning in mathematics.

When i was speaking about the Graph Library I meant the algorithmistsc
implementation of a powerfull package for operations with graphs as
mathematical object (graph - a set of vertexes, and a set of edges and a
function which for two given vertexes returns "true" if they are
"connected" )

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Libbrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: [math] FW: [interest in] SummerOfCode2005 "commons-math"
project


> Interesting.
> I did not know of Krysalis Wings...
> There's a difference between a graph plotter and a chart plotter: the
> source data. To me a chart-plotter is fed by a bunch of numbers whereas
> a graph-plotter is fed by a bunch of functions. From Krysalis Wings
> site:
>
> > Note
> > "Charts" are what some office suites call "graphs". "Graphs", however,
> > have an entirely different meaning in mathematics. Hence we prefer to
> > use the term "charts".
>
> You could say that "generating the numbers would be sufficient". It's
> not.
> A good graph plotter detects the cusps and other irregularities so that
> it does not, for example, join -infty to +infty by a line like any
> chart plotter would do. Caching the result for redraw (e.g. with good
> Java 2D objects) might also be a challenge of a graph-component...
>
> That characteristic is probably a very high requirement and is probably
> the reason why it's mostly only found in more general purpose
> computer-algebra-systems....
>
> Rostyslav, does your plotter achieve this ?
> (was it a graph-plotter or a chart-plotter?).
>
> paul
>
>
> Le 13 juin 05, à 22:13, J.Pietschmann a écrit :
> > Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> >> I fear it's off-goal but we took some time here to look for a
> >> graph-plotter, either Swing component or picture generator, that
> >> would be open-source, tested on several platforms. Well... we found
> >> none !
> >
> > That's interesting. Is the evaluation published somewhere? Or
> > could you put it into the Wiki: the packages evaluated, and
> > why they didn't fit your requirements?
> > I was under the impression JFreeChart is almost as good or better
> > than gnuplot, but I never took a really close look at it. There's
> > also Krysalis Wings...
> >
> > J.Pietschmann
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to