I'll hold off committing my changes in light of these previous discussions.

What is the status for a javadoc archive location?  Would it be unreasonable
to place javadoc in the java-repository?

Brent

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:53 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [math] javadoc for prior releases.
> 
> Brent,
> 
> I like the outcome that you are after and mentioned on the 
> site-dev list that I had been toying with patching the maven 
> site plugin to optionally do exactly what you are describing. 
>  Others - Hen, Brett - responded that while it is good to 
> have versioned javadoc available on the site, having the site 
> build pull and regenerate it each time is not the best 
> approach, since it never changes.  Hen suggested that we 
> might be better off establishing an apache javadoc repo where 
> we can publish these things *once* and then link to them 
> definitively.  Hen, Brett pls chime in if I have 
> misrepresented anything.
> 
> Can we agree on a definitive location on minotaur/www where 
> we can place versioned javadoc?  How about 
> jakarta.apache.org/commons/javadoc/<component>/<release>?
> 
> I am personally OK with committing your changes if you have 
> this working (including the SCM plugin dependency, as long as 
> it works on both Windoz and linux) and changing to use the 
> repo once we have that sorted.
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> On 5/31/05, Brent Worden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been working on automating the the generation of 
> javadoc for prior releases for inclusion on the website.  The 
> change involves adding a post goal to the javadoc report 
> goal.  The post goal performs a checkout from the repository 
> for a tagged version of the project.  Javadoc is then 
> executed on the checked out source, placing the generated 
> HTML in a directory at the same level as the default javadoc.
> > 
> > One downside to this change is that it requires using 
> version 1.5-beta-3 of the Maven SCM Plugin.  This is needed 
> because prior versions do not support Subversion.
> > 
> > If there are no objections, I will commit these changes.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to