Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > If not, then I will just release 3.2 with extra debugging and warning > notes, which is not good for our reputation.
Is it isolated to changes in LRUMap? I mean, can those reproducing it rollback to 3.1's (or near enough) LRUMap and it goes away? If so, that could be a way to get to 3.2. I don't know about releasing such a version with debugging and a known regression. perhaps labelled 3.2-beta with the extra debugging info to try and track it down? Just my 2c, I don't have time to test it right now. - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
