On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 12:38 -0400, James Carman wrote: > All, > > > > Is there a "standard" mock objects implementation that we are supposed to > use?
i'm not sure that we're really into this kind of 'standards': but it is worth asking the community if they have any preferences (and why)... > I like both EasyMock and JMock, but I'm starting to lean more towards > JMock for readability. Any thoughts only one: both have compatible licenses :) > /objections? none - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
