On 12/1/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Release managers are also facing tougher release checkers now IMHO. For > instance, I haven't ignored configuration, but haven't had the time to > check it out properly (way too much to do). I try to only give a +1 if I > genuinely am happy. Perhaps I'm now applying too high a standard? Its a > tough balance.
Adding to what Stephen said, voting +1 to me means at a minimum you're indicating knowledge of the code and/or an intention to support it in some way. For me I can do that on only 3 to 5 of the Commons components. A good example is FileUpload - as a user I would like to see a release, but I only recently looked at a bit of the code and made a minor contribution. When it comes to a vote I'm not sure whether I'll vote for it or not as I don't think I have the time to actually provide any support. Is this the generally accepted criteria or do others follow more or less lenient criteria? Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
