On 3/7/06, Sandy McArthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/7/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In our product code bases, we use the "this.foo()" convention. The > > argument being, that in object oriented programming, a message is sent > > to an object, always. > > > > How does the list feel about cleaning up foo()'s to this.foo()'s? > > > > I am willing to do this clean up, actually, I'll let Eclipse do it ;) > > > > Or, we can leave it all as is, with some classes doing it one way and > > others the other way. > > My position is that as you're working on a chunk of code, clean it up > to whatever you like but DO NOT go changing code just for cosmetic > sake. >
Phil says +1 to the remark above. Of course you could tell it is Phil speaking by the from header and the sig below ;-) Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
