On 3/12/06, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great. I did not know [pool] was so close. I can help with release > cutting mechanics. > > So...do we all agree that the 1.3 release branch below is in good > enough shape to begin cutting a release?
Yes, the changelog is the last bit of prep I can think of. > On 3/11/06, Sandy McArthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Pool 1.3 is long over due and the 1.3 branch is where I think it > > should be for a release, at least code wise. The todo list for me is > > create a release-notes-1.3.xml and figure out maven. I've never > > actually used maven but it looks like I cannot put that off too > > longer. > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta/commons/proper/pool/branches/1_3_RELEASE_BRANCH/ > > > > On 3/11/06, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The failing tests in [dbcp] are because of BZ 29832. This appears to > > > be caused by BZ 29863 against [pool] which is marked as FIXED. I know > > > we are looking at some major restructuring / rewrite of [pool], but is > > > any one willing to roll a minor release to get this and any other bug > > > fixes out? Alternatively, we could insert a workaround for the [dbcp] > > > problem. -- Sandy McArthur "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
