I am in favor of putting it back (don't consider this "binding" though). Being able to be a drop in
replacement of previous versions is pretty important for logging I think..
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
remy ran a regression test for RC6 (thanks :)
we no long ship the jdk logger in API jar. however, tomcat uses jdk
logger as it's default. so, by excluding the jdk logger, JCL 1.1 is no
longer a drop in replacement at least for tomcat.
so, i thought it'd be a good time to reconsider the decision to exclude
the jdk logger.
opinions?
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
