Rodrigo Severo wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Rodrigo Severo writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
If there are equal priority MXes each attempt should go to a random
MX.
As I already said, if this is the current behaviour of Courier
that's good. What I am suggesting here is that, if all top priority
MXs were already tried, why not step to the next priority level and
try to deliver the message to them? After all that's why they exist
isn't it?
Right. And if Courier cannot contact the primary MX, it will then
try to contact one randomly-chosen next priority MX.
Sam, you mention several times ""
Sorry for this half sentence. Just garbage, please ignore.
Rodrigo
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
