> I think bottom line is that CSS is not really at the stage where it can be > used for page layout for complex layouts (not that mine is that complex - > but still haven't seen a solution that can work here).
You might be right, and I must say that by standing your ground and using a hybrid CSS/Table layout with properly named IDs and classes (my favourite is <div class="block block-block" id="block-block-1">, I like Ian Dury) you have created a layout that is sure to give me hours of fun exploring the site: http://onlinetools.org/tests/shot.png That whole CSS Malarkey seems to be the same swindlle as being a superstar. The other day I spent hours making my hair cool with a lot of spray, taking some drugs and wearing my leather jacket and shades. I still had to pay entrance to the club and was neither approached by sponsors or jumped by love crazed groupies. Clearly it is not worth the effort to learn an instrument, take singing lessons or write some lyrics. As all users are idiots who don't know what is good for them the only good web design is creating GIFs of all the pages and covering them with image maps. Good authoring tools do that automatically for you. True, there is the search engine problem but I heard adding lots of keywords in meta tags, titles and the file name works around that little problem. * may contain sarcasm to avoid expletives. No animals of were hurt in the making of this email ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
