Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- Begin Message ----Caveat Lector- http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/murawiec/murawiec.phpLaurent Murawiec, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute and former Rand analyst, has various dubious distinctions: He is a former Lyndon LaRouche colleague and executive editor of LaRouche's Executive Intelligence Review; and when he was invited by the then-Richard-Perle-led Defense Policy Board in July 2002 to give a talk on the Middle East, he delivered a highly controversial diatribe regarding Saudi Arabia. In his presentation, which was leaked by a board member, Muraweic said: "[Saudi Arabia is] the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the most dangerous opponent." (4) Later, he told ITP.net (August 13, 2002): "My experience of your part of the world is that most people hate the Saudis' guts, not to make too fine a point about it. Everybody knows they are a bunch of lazy assholes that are arrogant, too big for their shoes, which behave in a consistently disgusting manner. People in your region have told me that for 20 years. But I am not telling you anything new." After ITP.net published the remark, Murawiec denied he ever spoke with an ITP.net reporter. ITP.net subsequently released the recorded conversation. (3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sources (1) The Hudson Institute: Staff Bio: Laurent Murawiec http://www.hudson.org/learn/index.cfm?fuseaction=staff_bio&eid=Murawiec (2) "Is Egypt in Play & Why Is It the Prize," Defense in the National Interest, August 16, 2002 http://www.d-n-i.net/fcs/comments/c457.htm (3) "The PowerPoint that Rocked the Pentagon," Slate.com, August 7, 2002 http://slate.msn.com//?id=2069119 (4) Washington Post, August 13, 2002 --------------- http://slate.msn.com/id/2069119/ The PowerPoint That Rocked the Pentagon The LaRouchie defector who's advising the defense establishment on Saudi Arabia. By Jack Shafer Posted Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2002, at 4:49 PM PT Diplomatic china rattled in Washington and cracked in Riyadh yesterday when the Washington Post published a story about a briefing given to a Pentagon advisory group last month. The briefing declared Saudi Arabia an enemy of the United States and advocated that the United States invade the country, seize its oil fields, and confiscate its financial assets unless the Saudis stop supporting the anti-Western terror network. The Page One story, by Thomas E. Ricks ("Briefing Depicted Saudis as Enemies: Ultimatum Urged To Pentagon Board," Aug. 6), described a 24-slide presentation given by Rand Corp. analyst Laurent Murawiec on July 10, 2002, to the Defense Policy Board, a committee of foreign policy wonks and former government officials that advises the Pentagon on defense issues. Murawiec's PowerPoint scenario, which is reproduced for the first time below, makes him sound like an aspiring Dr. Strangelove. Just who the hell is Laurent Murawiec? The Post story and its follow-up, also by Ricks, do not explain. The Pentagon and the administration insist that the presentation does not reflect their views in any way. The Rand Corp. acknowledges its association with Murawiec, but likewise disavows any connection with the briefing. (Neither Murawiec nor Rand received money for the briefing, Rand says.) According to Newsday, Defense Policy Board Chairman Richard N. Perle, a former Pentagon official and full-time invade-Iraq hawk, invited Murawiec to brief the group, so Perle can't exactly distance himself from the presentation. But he can do the next best thing‹duck reporters' questions. Murawiec also declined reporters' inquiries, including one from Slate. The first half of Murawiec's presentation reads calmly enough, echoing Fareed Zakaria's Oct. 15, 2001, Newsweek essay about why the Arab world hates the United States. Its tribal, despotic regimes bottle up domestic dissent but indulge the exportation of political anger; intellectually, its people are trapped in the Middle Ages; its institutions lack the tools to deal with 21st-century problems; yadda yadda yadda. But then Murawiec lights out for the extreme foreign policy territory, recommending that we threaten Medina and Mecca, home to Islam's most holy places, if they don't see it our way. Ultimately, he champions a takeover of Saudi Arabia. The last slide in the deck, titled "Grand strategy for the Middle East," abandons the outrageous for the incomprehensible. It reads: * Iraq is the tactical pivot * Saudi Arabia the strategic pivot * Egypt the prize Egypt the prize? Because none of the Defense Policy Board attendees are talking candidly about the session, it's hard to divine what "Egypt the prize" means or if Murawiec's briefing put it into any context. It sounds a tad loopy, even by Dr. Strangelove standards. The Post report does mention a "talking point" attached to the 24-page PowerPoint deck that describes Saudi Arabia as "the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the most dangerous opponent" in the Middle East. That's extreme talk even by the standards of the anti-Saudi editorialists at the Weekly Standard and the rest of the invade-Iraq fellowship. Who is Laurent Murawiec, and where did he learn to write like this? The George Washington University Elliot School of International Affairs' Web site lists him as a faculty member, but it lists no current or future classes by him. The site's biographical page adds that he's a graduate of the Sorbonne University, that he worked as "A foreign correspondent for a major French business weekly in Germany" (isn't that kind of vague?) and is the co-founder of GeoPol Services SA, "a consulting company in Geneva, Switzerland, which advised major multinational corporations and banks." It also lists him as a former adviser to the French ministry of defense and the translator (into French) of Clausewitz's On War. A sweep of the Web shows that he lectured on Islamic terrorism in Toronto on March 11, 2002, under the aegis of the Canadian Institute for Strategic Studies. He wrote an article titled "The Wacky World of French Intellectuals" in the Middle East Quarterly, co-edited a Rand Corp. book, and made these comments at a Nautilus Institute conference. When he spoke on panel with Richard Perle at the American Enterprise Institute on Dec. 1, 1999, Murawiec was introduced as having just moved to the United States after "a dozen years" of working as managing director of GeoPol in Geneva, "a service that supplies advice to European clients, similar to what Kissinger Associates offers from New York, except without the accent." That is a bit of an overstatement. A Google search of "Murawiec and GeoPol" produces 12 hits. Compare that to the 10,300 hits on Google for "Kissinger Associates." Murawiec's résumé would predict many Nexis hits, but a search of his name reveals just five bylines: Twice already this year, Murawiec has contributed to the neocon publication the National Interest, on the subject of Russia. [Correction: Murawiec wrote for the National Interest once in 2000 and once in 2002. The topic both times was Russia.] In 1999 he wrote for the Post's "Outlook" section on "internationalism," and in 1996 he contributed a piece to the Journal of Commerce on Russia. His only other Nexis-able byline is a dusty one from the Jan. 23, 1985, edition of the Financial Times, which describes Murawiec as "the European Economics Editor of the New York-based Executive Intelligence Review weekly magazine." Executive Intelligence Review, as scholars of parapolitics know, is a publication of the political fantasist, convicted felon, and perpetual presidential candidate Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr. It's not clear exactly when Murawiec left the LaRouche orbit. An article by LaRouche that appeared last year in Executive Intelligence Review calls Murawiec "a real-life 'Beetlebaum' of the legendary mythical horse-race, and a hand-me-down political carcass, currently in the possession of institutions of a peculiar odor." In 1997, LaRouche's wife Helga Zupp LaRouche wrote in Executive Intelligence Review (republished in the LaRouche-affiliated AboutSudan.com Web site) that Murawiec "was once part of our organization and is now on the side of organized crime." The truth value of that statement surely ranks up there with LaRouche's claim that the Queen of England controls the crack trade. To say, zero. When Murawiec departed LaRouche's company is unclear, but Dennis King, author of 1989's Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism, thinks it came when many followers split as LaRouche's legal problems grew and climaxed with a 1988 conviction for conspiracy and mail fraud. "[Murawiec] was not a political leader," says King, "but a follower who did intelligence-gathering." Now that Murawiec has assumed such a vocal place in the policy debate, the man who gave him the lectern owes us the complete back-story. Over to you, Richard Perle. ****** Laurent Murawiec's 24-slide presentation to the Defense Policy Board was obtained by Slate and is presented here in type-treatment that approximates the original. 000000000000 Taking Saudi Out of Arabia Laurent Murawiec RAND Defense Policy Board July 10, 2002 1 Taking Saudi out of Arabia: Contents * The Arab Crisis * "Saudi" Arabia * Strategies 2 The Arab Crisis 3 The systemic crisis of the Arab World * The Arab world has been in a systemic crisis for the last 200 years * It missed out on the industrial revolution, it is missing out on the digital revolution * Lack of inner resources to cope with modern world 4 Shattered Arab self-esteem * Shattered self-esteem * Could God be wrong? * Turn the rage against those who contradict God: the West, object of hatred * A whole generation of violently anti-Western, anti-American, anti-modern shock-troops 5 What has the Arab world produced? * Since independence, wars have been the principal output of the Arab world * Demographic and economic problems made intractable by failure to establish stable polities aiming at prosperity * All Arab states are either failing states or threatened to fail 6 The Crisis of the Arab world reaches a climax * The tension between the Arab world and the modern world has reached a climax * The Arab world's home-made problems overwhelm its ability to cope * The crisis is consequently being exported to the rest of the world 7 How does change occur in the Arab world? * There is no agora, no public space for debating ideas, interests, policies * The tribal group in power blocks all avenues of change, represses all advocates of change * Plot, riot, murder, coup are the only available means to bring about political change 8 The continuation of politics by other means? * In the Arab world, violence is not a continuation of politics by other means -- violence is politics, politics is violence * This culture of violence is the prime enabler of terrorism * Terror as an accepted, legitimate means of carrying out politics, has been incubated for 30 years ... 9 The crisis cannot be contained to the Arab world alone * The crisis has irreversibly spilled out of the region * 9/11 was a symptom of the "overflow" * The paroxysm is liable to last for several decades * U.S. response will decisively influence the duration and outcome 10 "Saudi" Arabia 11 The old partnership * Once upon a time, there was a partnership between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia * Partnerships, like alliances, are embodied in practices, ideas, policies, institutions, people -- which persist after the alliance has died 12 "Saudi" Arabia * An instable group: Since 1745, 58% of all rulers of the House of Saud have met a violent demise * Wahhabism loathes modernity, capitalism, human rights, religious freedom, democracy, republics, an open society -- and practices the very opposite * As long as enmity had no or little consequences outside the kingdom, the bargain between the House of Saud and the U.S. held 13 Means, motive, opportunity * 1973: Saudi Arabia unleashes the Oil Shock, absorbs immense flows of resources -- means * 1978: Khomeiny challenges the Saudis' Islamic credentials, provoking a radicalization and world-wide spread of Wahhabism in response -- motive * 1979-1989: the anti-Soviet Jihad gives life and strength to the Wahhabi putsch within Sunni Islam -- opportunity. The Taliban are the result 14 The impact on Saudi policy * Wahhabism moves from Islam's lunatic fringe to center-stage -- its mission now extends world-wide * Saudis launch a putsch within Sunni Islam * Shift from pragmatic oil policy to promotion of radical Islam * Establish Saudi as "the indispensable State" -- treasurers of radical, fundamentalist, terrorist groups 15 Saudis see themselves * God placed the oil in the kingdom as a sign of divine approval * Spread Wahhabism everywhere, but keep the power of the al-Saud undiminished * Survive by creating a Wahhabi-friendly environment -- fundamentalist regimes -- throughout the Moslem world and beyond 16 The House of Saud today * Saudi Arabia is central to the self-destruction of the Arab world and the chief vector of the Arab crisis and its outwardly-directed aggression * The Saudis are active at every level of the terror chain, from planners to financiers, from cadre to foot-soldier, from ideologist to cheerleader * Saudi Arabia supports our enemies and attacks our allies * A daily outpouring of virulent hatred against the U.S. from Saudi media, "educational" institutions, clerics, officials -- Saudis tell us one thing in private, do the contrary in reality 17 Strategies 18 What is to be done? * During and after World War I, Britain's India Office backed the House of Saud; the Foreign Office backed the Hashemites. The India Office won * But the entire post-1917 Middle East settlement designed by the British to replace the Ottoman Empire is fraying * The role assigned to the House of Saud in that arrangement has become obsolete -- and nefarious 19 "Saudi Arabia" is not a God- given entity * The House of Saud was given dominion over Arabia in 1922 by the British * It wrested the Guardianship of the Holy Places -- Mecca and Medina -- from the Hashemite dynasty * There is an "Arabia," but it needs not be "Saudi" 20 An ultimatum to the House of Saud * Stop any funding and support for any fundamentalist madrasa, mosque, ulama, predicator anywhere in the world * Stop all anti-U.S., anti-Israeli, anti-Western predication, writings, etc., within Arabia * Dismantle, ban all the kingdom's "Islamic charities," confiscate their assets * Prosecute or isolate those involved in the terror chain, including in the Saudi intelligence services 21 Or else ... * What the House of Saud holds dear can be targeted: ‹Oil: the old fields are defended by U.S. forces, and located in a mostly Shiite area ‹Money: the Kingdom is in dire financial straits, its valuable assets invested in dollars, largely in the U.S. ‹The Holy Places: let it be known that alternatives are being canvassed 22 Other Arabs? * The Saudis are hated throughout the Arab world: lazy, overbearing, dishonest, corrupt * If truly moderate regimes arise, the Wahhabi-Saudi nexus is pushed back into its extremist corner * The Hashemites have greater legitimacy as Guardians of Mecca and Medina 23 Grand strategy for the Middle East € Iraq is the tactical pivot € Saudi Arabia the strategic pivot € Egypt the prize 24 Jack Shafer is Slate's editor at large. More press box God Bless Judith Miller Two cheers for our courageous First Amendment martyr. posted Oct. 8, 2004 Jack Shafer Raging Bull Smoking out candidates' smears and distortions. posted Oct. 7, 2004 Jack Shafer Quick Draw CNN's pundits make a mad dash to call Cheney vs. Edwards a tie. posted Oct. 6, 2004 Jack Shafer Kissing up to Kissinger The reporters who loved Henry and what they said. posted Oct. 4, 2004 Jack Shafer Kissinger's Travels He ducks the New York Times yet again. posted Oct. 1, 2004 Jack Shafer Search for more Press Box in our archive. What did you think of this article? Join the Fray, our reader discussion forum POST A MESSAGE READ MESSAGES Notes From The Fray Editor: While The Fray noodled about the "unfathomable koan" that is "Egypt the Prize," it also took Murawiec to task for bad PowerPointing. Remarks From The Fray: The best initial comment about the Laurent Murewiec's power-point presentation on Saudi Arabia is that it is poorly done. I evaluate undergraduate presentations all the time, and as I was reading Murewiec's outline, I was thinking, "My God, this is a bad piece of work." What a loose jumble of lazy stereotypes! Didn't this guy do any research? But then, I've seen Richard Perle on tv and I know that he is a really smart guy. So why is a smart guy like Richard Perle promoting a guy like Laurent Murewiac who embodies the ultimate trifecta of incompetence. He's lazy, stupid, and wacko. My little theory on this is that part of what characterizes the Bush administration is "macho stupidity"‹smart guys like Perle, Cheney, and Bush who show themselves and the world that they're real men by pursuing dumb and self-defeating ideas. One way to interpret the upcoming invasion of Iraq is as an exercise in "macho stupidity." In their heart of hearts, the Bush people know that invading Iraq will be a big distraction from the real terrorists. They know there will be unforeseen and unforeseeable consequences to occupying Iraq, and they know that the rest of the world will disagree. In other words, people like Cheney and Perle know that invading Iraq is stupid, but they feel driven to prove their manhood by pursuing stupid, simple-minded strategies and damn the consequences. The main problem that the Bush administration has for nuance is that they think that real men are John-Wayne simple and that nuance is for non-heterosexuals. -- Keep a Clear Eye (To reply, click here.) Lemme start with the good news: the Defence Policy Board, chaired by the low-grade war criminal Richard Perle, has no power whatsoever. The bad news is that the Bush Administration is run with such outlandish incompetence that they might get a bit of power by accident some timeŠ. ------------ http://slate.msn.com/id/2070190/ The Continuing Saga of Laurent (of Arabia) Murawiec The Rand analyst whose PowerPoint rocked the Pentagon returns to the news. By Jack Shafer Posted Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2002, at 3:06 PM PT Rand Corp. analyst Laurent Murawiec, who set off an international incident three weeks ago when the Washington Post reported the substance of an anti-Saudi briefing he gave in July to the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, seems to have stepped in it again. On Aug. 13, the Dubai news site ITP.net quoted extensively from a telephone interview Murawiec purportedly gave to Arabian Business reporter Massoud Derhally. According to Derhally's story, "Potent words, softly spoken, rock Saudi-U.S. relations," Murawiec said that a gag order prevented him from talking about the Pentagon briefing but offered these observations about the Saudis and the Arab world: My experience of your part of the world is that most people hate the Saudis' guts, not to make too fine a point about it. Everybody knows they are a bunch of lazy assholes that are arrogant, too big for their shoes, which behave in a consistently disgusting manner. People in your region have told me that for 20 years. But I am not telling you anything new. A week later in an Agence France-Presse news story, Murawiec denied the statements attributed to him. "I gave no interview neither to that guy ... nor to anybody. The whole story is spurious and void," Murawiec said. IPT.net responded immediately with a story, "Taped interview exposes lies from U.S. analyst," which included this Windows Media sound recording of the purported interview to prove Murawiec talked to them. Does the voice on the recording belong to Murawiec? Murawiec deflected Slate's query to a spokesperson at Rand, where he still works, and the spokesperson said the think tank's only comment was this statement released last week by Murawiec's boss, Rand President James Thompson: "The comments on the tape recording on the website ITP.net are offensive and repugnant, and Rand repudiates them in the strongest terms. Rand was unaware of these comments until they were reported by ITP.net." Rand President Thompson's "strongest terms," which neither confirm nor deny that the voice is Murawiec's, surely take the "think" out of "think tank." For those arriving at the story late, the Rand analyst roiled U.S.-Saudi relations in early August when the Washington Post reported on Page One the gist of his 24-slide, July 10 PowerPoint briefing before the Defense Policy Board, a 31-member, bipartisan advisory committee headed by Middle East hawk Richard M. Perle and comprised of defense and foreign-policy experts. Murawiec's PowerPoint deck, published in "Press Box," portrayed Saudi Arabia as "active at every level of the terror chain, from planners to financiers, from cadre to foot-soldier, from ideologist to cheerleader." He recommended that the United States "target" Saudi Arabia's oil, financial holdings, and even its "holy places" unless the country stamped out anti-U.S. and anti-Israel writings, stopped funding fundamentalist mosques, and prosecuted or isolated "those involved in the terror chain, including in the Saudi intelligence services." The U.S. damage control brigade assuaged Arabs who convulsed at the Post's scoop. Secretary of State Colin Powell told the Saudi foreign minister the briefing had no bearing on U.S. policy. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, under whom the Defense Policy Board toils, similarly distanced himself from the presentation. Other polite dissociations followed the flap. Perle, who had invited Murawiec to speak to the Defense Policy Board, told Time magazine he didn't know what Murawiec was going to say before the talk. The Rand Corp. stated in a press release that Murawiec's presentation was not paid for or commissioned by Rand and that the views he expressed were his alone. Shortly after the Post story ran, George Washington University's Elliot School of International Affairs took down the page(http://www.gwu.edu/~elliott/facultystaff/murawiec.cfm) that listed him as a faculty member. Elliott School Associate Dean Kristin Lord says the school decided not to rehire Murawiec as an adjunct professor "around December" of last year and that the disappearance of Murawiec's faculty member page was not related to the controversy. According to Elliott School professor Gordon Adams, Murawiec worked for the school for two semesters and was introduced to it by people at Rand. (A description of Murawiec's fall 2000 course, "Revolution in 21st Century Warfare," remains on the school's Web site.) The only good news falling on Murawiec these days is the bad news posted on the Web by his former colleagues at the paranoid political organization headed by convicted felon and perpetual presidential candidate Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr. Prior to the Pentagon Powerpoint flap, if the LaRouche organization mentioned Murawiec at all, it treated him as a minor defector who had joined the organization in the early '70s, serving as the "European economics editor" of Executive Intelligence Review before leaving in the late '80s. For instance, in a Jan. 2001 article, LaRouche abuse of Murawiec was limited to this sort of towel snapping: Murawiec was "a real-life 'Beetlebaum' of the legendary mythical horse-race, and a hand-me-down political carcass, currently in the possession of institutions of a peculiar odor." But now that Murawiec is making news, working alongside LaRouche's neoconservative archenemies, his crimes rival those of Animal Farm's Snowball. According to an Aug. 16 posting on LaRouche's Executive Intelligence Review Web site, by the late '80s the man the LaRouchies now call "Laurent 'of Arabia' Murawiec" had become a "pathetic, babbling turncoat." Without a sliver of evidence, the piece accuses Murawiec of "covertly" working with "a Swiss-based network of intelligence-connected weapons traffickers, whose London and Washington controllers were coordinating, that year, a high-intensity, international campaign of judicial attacks and dirty tricks against LaRouche and his associates." To capture the full warp and woof of the LaRouchies' barking mad denunciations, try this: Murawiec first showed his emerging corruption when he opposed the March 1986 publication of EIR's thoroughly documented special report, Moscow's Secret Weapon: Ariel Sharon and the Israeli Mafia. This 126-page report highlighted Sharon's U.S. organized-crime-connected backers who ran the infamous Israeli spy in the U.S. Defense Department, Jonathan Pollard. Highly classified material stolen by Pollard was used in Israeli "U.S. secrets-for-Jewish-emigres" trades with the kind of Soviet KGB elements who later grouped around the financial oligarchs plundering post-Soviet Russia in the 1990s. By the late 1980s, on command, Murawiec was running an internal disruption operation within the Wiesbaden EIR office‹supervised by the same people who promoted his subsequent career when his presence in that EIR office became overtly untenable, in 1990. Monsieur Murawiec went from money from then-fugitive Marc Rich's Paris-based Marc Rich Foundation; to a dubious strategic affairs consultancy, GeoPol, hosted by a narcotics money-laundering Geneva, Switzerland bank; to a think-tank career in France promoting Pentagon Office of Net Assessments (ONA) digital cyberwar scenarios; to his posting to the Rand Corporation in Washington, and his Richard Perle-organized debutante's public appearance at Perle's American Enterprise Institute (AEI) in December 1999. ... Murawiec's current notoriety now permits us to divulge not merely who wants to plunge the world into an era of Clash of Civilizations war, but, how much that cabal has seen Lyndon LaRouche as its main opponent to their "vision" of an America turned into a caricature of the world's discarded imperial systems. And so on, conspiracies within conspiracies, cabals within cabals. According to another Aug. 16 posting on Executive Intelligence Review, the neocon's tendrils have even reached out to include a certain Jack Shafer, who posted a childish piece datelined slate.msn.com August 7, 2002, at 4:49 P.M. The notable feature of Shafer's concoction is that he has the same profile as Murawiec, minus what are Murawiec's actual French academic credentials. Shafer appears to be owned by the same folk who own Murawiec, but is, doubtless, much more poorly paid for his maliciously reckless disregard for truth. Perhaps that is Shafer's gripe. Agent Shafer to neoconservative controls Perle, Kristol, Wolfowitz, Pipes, Ikle: Send instructions for next covert op. And, please, more money. (Many thanks to the readers who alerted me to the Murawiec story on ITP.net. If you've got a tip for me or a comment, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Jack Shafer is Slate's editor at large. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
--- End Message ---
