In a message dated 6/2/2001 5:42:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


In the Vietnam days, secrecy was justified by national security. In the
current drug war, it is a matter of corporate confidentiality. Janet
Wineriter, a spokeswoman at DynCorp's headquarters in Reston, near
Washington's Dulles airport, said she could not discuss DynCorp's operations
in Colombia because of its contractual obligations to its client, the state
department.

Scott Harris, the spokesman for the state department's bureau for
international narcotics and law enforcement affairs, said he could not
comment because of the contractor's right to privacy.

Similarly, ADC diverts inquiries to its Alabama lawyer, Mike Waters, who
refused comment on grounds of "normal client confidentiality".

Lynis Cox, a civilian public affairs officer at Maxwell air force base, from
where ADC has operated since 1998, said: "I know they have a hangar out
there on the base, but no one here seems to know much about them."

In Bogota, government officials are also tight-lipped about the increasingly
unpopular privatisation of the conflict. A helicopter pilot in the Colombian
anti-narcotics police said: "From Bush down, they want to cover up what
they're doing. Not even the president wants to talk about private companies
flying fumigation missions here in Colombia."




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Yahoo! Website Services- Click Here!
Yahoo! Website Services- Click Here!

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


A plane is shot down and the US proxy war on drug barons unravels
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,500326,00.html

Julian Borger in Washington and Martin Hodgson in Bogota
Saturday June 2, 2001
The Guardian

When a small plane carrying US missionaries was shot down a few weeks ago in
Peru, killing a young woman and her seven-month-old baby girl, it first
seemed to be a tragic case of trigger-happy policing by the Peruvian air
force.
But as more details emerge from the Andean jungle, it is clear this
apparently isolated incident has a far greater significance. The deaths have
helped yank the covers from the secret side of America's billion-dollar drug
war in Latin America.

The missionaries' plane was shot down by a Peruvian military pilot, but it
was first spotted and targeted by a US Cessna Citation surveillance plane
patrolling the air routes between Peru and Colombia on the look out for
cocaine traffickers.

The surveillance plane was piloted not by US military pilots but by private
contractors who, according to US congressional officials, were hired by an
Alabama-based company called Aviation Development Corporation (ADC). In the
words of one outraged official: "There were just businessmen in that plane.
They were accountable to no one but their bottom line."

A state department inquiry is still taking place into the deaths of Veronica
and Charity Bowers, the victims of the April 20 shootdown. Administration
sources quoted in the US press suggested that the American Cessna crew
cautioned their Peruvian air force counterparts against shooting the plane
down, but no one is denying it was the Cessna that wrongly identified the
missionaries' plane as suspect.

Moreover, the involvement of a US firm operating for profit over the
Peruvian and Colombian jungles has drawn attention to an important but
little-noticed trend - the privatisation of the drug war.

Congress is now trying to investigate the role of the commercial contractors
and two bills have been proposed to try to curb their influence. Their
chances of success in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives are
unclear, but their sponsors are determined to force the administration to at
least explain its actions.

"We are hiring a private army," Janice Schakowsky, a Democratic
congresswoman who authored one of the bills, told the Guardian. "We are
engaging in a secret war, and the American people need to be told why."

A private corporation based in Virginia called DynCorp carries out much of
the aerial spraying of coca plantations in Colombia. When a police
helicopter was shot down in February by the rebel Revolutionary Armed Forces
of Colombia, DynCorp sent in its own armed security men, in a
search-and-rescue helicopter, who exchanged fire with the rebels and brought
the policemen to safety. DynCorp pilots also ferry Colombian troops in and
out of battle, and train Colombian helicopter and fixed-wing pilots.

Another US company, AirScan, based in Florida, works alongside ADC carrying
out aerial surveillance in Colombia, using state-of-the-art imaging to
pinpoint coca fields and guerrillas trying to bomb the Cano Limon oil
pipeline.

Meanwhile, Military Professional Resources Inc, another Virginia-based
consultancy group set up by former generals, has carried out officer
training for the Colombian police and army.

The rise of the private contractor is arguably an inevitable outcome of US
anti-drug policy under Bill Clinton and now President Bush. Last year,
Congress approved $1.3bn expenditure on Plan Colombia, an ambitious
programme of military aid to Bogota to try to stem the flow of drugs at the
supply end.

But, concerned that Colombia could become a Vietnam-like quagmire, Congress
imposed a cap on official US military involvement of 500 trainers and
advisers. Into the gaping and lucrative gap stepped US commercial
enterprise.

Richard White, a former ambassador to El Salvador, sees the trend towards
privatisation as a symptom of Washington's failure to come to terms with its
own military-based anti-drug strategy.

Mr White, now head of the Centre for International Policy, said: "I believe
it's dishonourable for the US to resort to mercenaries to carry out its
policy. If we are committed to intervening in Colombia in pursuit of US
interests, then we should mobilise whatever military resources we need to
accomplish this."

This is not the first time the US has resorted to mercenaries. The exploits
of the pilots who flew in south-east Asia for the CIA front company, Air
America, are legendary. As today in Colombia and Peru, Air America provided
Washington with distance and deniability. But it was a CIA-run operation.
Today's mercenaries in the drug war are provided by private companies
selling a service and are used as a matter of course by both the state and
defence.

In the Vietnam days, secrecy was justified by national security. In the
current drug war, it is a matter of corporate confidentiality. Janet
Wineriter, a spokeswoman at DynCorp's headquarters in Reston, near
Washington's Dulles airport, said she could not discuss DynCorp's operations
in Colombia because of its contractual obligations to its client, the state
department.

Scott Harris, the spokesman for the state department's bureau for
international narcotics and law enforcement affairs, said he could not
comment because of the contractor's right to privacy.

Similarly, ADC diverts inquiries to its Alabama lawyer, Mike Waters, who
refused comment on grounds of "normal client confidentiality".

Lynis Cox, a civilian public affairs officer at Maxwell air force base, from
where ADC has operated since 1998, said: "I know they have a hangar out
there on the base, but no one here seems to know much about them."

In Bogota, government officials are also tight-lipped about the increasingly
unpopular privatisation of the conflict. A helicopter pilot in the Colombian
anti-narcotics police said: "From Bush down, they want to cover up what
they're doing. Not even the president wants to talk about private companies
flying fumigation missions here in Colombia."

Members of US Congress are having similar problems getting information. Ms
Schakowsky said the house sub-committee on government reform was being
stonewalled by the state department and other federal agencies over the role
of private contractors. "The CIA did not even show up," she said. "Why is
this classified if taxpayers' money is being spent?"

A copy of DynCorp's five-year, $200m contract obtained by the Guardian is
vague, with little about its rules of engagement. Under the heading "Search
and Rescue", for example, it stipulates only: "This operation deals with
downed aircraft or hostile action by narcotics producers or traffickers."

Major Andy Messing, who served as a US adviser in El Salvador and worked as
a military consultant in Colombia, warned: "If there had been a US air force
pilot in that plane in Peru, you can bet the Peruvians would have listened
to him. The private guys have no authority. They are all potential
hostages."

Three years ago a paper written at the Army War College by a Colonel Bruce
Grant warned: "Foreign policy is [being] made by default [by] private
military consultants motivated by bottom-line profits." Now, Major Messing
argues, the warning is coming true: "DynCorp's guys are old geezers who've
retired, and they're down there making $109,000 tax-free.

"Every time you have contractors this is what happens. They just prolong the
whole mess."

The firms fighting America's drug war

DynCorp

Based Reston, Virginia

Description A huge corporation that supplies electronics and a range of
contract services to the US government, which provides most of DynCorp's
$1.4bn in business. It is also under scrutiny for its role in training US
members of the UN police force in Bosnia

Role in drug war It has a five-year, $200m contract to provide crop-dusting
pilots for eradication of coca plantations and helicopter pilots to ferry
Colombian troops and DynCorp's own "security" personnel

Aviation Development Corporation

Based Maxwell air force base, Alabama

Description A secretive company set up in 1998 to test aerial electronic
sensors

Role in drug war It flies Cessna spotter planes for the CIA in Peru and
possibly Colombia to help target aircraft used by drug smugglers

AirScan

Based Rockledge, Florida

Description Provides state-of-the-art air surveillance, also used in Angola

Role in the drug war Patrols the Colombian jungle in Cessna Skymaster
electronic surveillance planes, seeking out coca plantations and guerrilla
threats to the Cano Limon oil pipeline

Military Professional Resources Inc

Based Alexandria, Virginia

Description A consultancy set up by former US generals. Its biggest previous
mission was the training of the Croatian army before its successful 1995
offensive against the Serbs

Role in drug war It has just completed a $6m year-long contract providing a
14-man training team for Colombian army and police officers. The
effectiveness of the training was questioned by Bogota

---
FYI: This mail sent by Mario Profaca is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.256 / Virus Database: 129 - Release Date: 31. 05. 01


==============================================
 SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter
 and discussion list associated to
 Mario's Cyberspace Station
 http://mprofaca.cro.net/mainmenu.html
==============================================
*** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
 Section 107, this material is distributed
 without profit to SPYNEWS eGroup members
 who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
 the included information for non-profit research
 and educational purposes only.

 For more information go to:
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 ----------------------------------------------
 To subscribe SPYNEWS send a blank message:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To change your subscription mode to Daily Digest
 (one message a day) send a blank message:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To unsubscribe SPYNEWS send a blank message:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Mario Profaca, independent journalist,
 SPY NEWS eGroup list owner, editor
 & moderator, is a member of of the
 Committee of Concerned Journalists,
 an initiative administered through
 the offices of the Project for
 Excellence in Journalism in Washington, D.C.
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 SPY NEWS home page:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews

 Spy books, handbooks and manuals:
 http://mprofaca.cro.net/spybooks.html
=============================================


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






Reply via email to