http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/08/21/13023.html



Pravda.RU:Main:More in detail

19:03 2001-08-21

ANDREI KRUSHINSKY: TRIAL ON HENRY KISSINGER

The Hong Kong weekly Far Eastern Economic Review published an article
entitled “Henry Kissinger and Wars in Asia” (marked as August 23). So the
East-Asia region also got involved in the campaign to bring former US
Secretary to the international tribunal.

As it turns out, when Russia’s senior governmental officials were welcoming
Kissinger, the trouble was brewing for him in the USA and Europe. This
trouble is so thick now that Kissinger would not risk to show up in any
country of the West. Christopher Hitchens – an Englishman living in the US, a
columnist of the leftist-liberal newspaper The Nation has recently released a
book entitled “The Case Against Henry Kissinger”. The book became a
bestseller at once and the campaign took another scale. It does not go about
the speculation – the readers can find the proofs of the that in the
following quotations:

Feed (USA): In a series of essays in Harper's entitled "The Case Against
Henry Kissinger," he argues that the national security adviser and secretary
of state under Nixon and Ford ought to be prosecuted for war crimes for his
role in assassinations, occupations, and executions in Indochina, Chile,
Bangladesh, East Timor, and Cyprus. ..In the course of a recent conversation
on these essays and his upcoming book on the same subject, Hitchens described
Kissinger as "a murderer, a liar, a pseudo-intellectual, a thief of
government property, and a profiteer from said theft."

Le Monde(France): Reported earlier this month that when French Judge Roger Le
Loire had a summons served on Kissinger on May 31 at the Ritz Hotel in Paris,
Kissinger fled Paris. The judge wanted to ask Kissinger about his knowledge
of Operation Condor, the scheme evolved by Pinochet and other Latin American
proconsuls of the American Empire to kill or "disappear" their opponents.

Guardian (Great Britain): A judge in Santiago has drawn up a list of
questions for the US statesman and Nobel laureate, Henry Kissinger, about the
1973 killing of the American journalist Charles Horman, whose execution by
forces loyal to General Augusto Pinochet was dramatised in the Hollywood
film, Missing. The questions, drawn up by the investigating magistrate Juan
Guzman and lawyers for the victims of the Pinochet regime, were submitted to
Chile's supreme court, which must now decide whether to forward them to the
US.

Far Eastern Economic Rewue (Hong Kong): In his latest book, Washington gadfly
Christopher Hitchens asks whether the United States is living by double
standards, condemning other nations for their human-rights records while
harbouring one of the 20th century's most deadly war criminals.

Salon_com Books: If killing hundreds of thousands of innocent peasants by
dropping million of tons of bombs on undefended civilian targets is not a war
crime, then there are no war crimes. If Kissinger is not responsible for
these crimes, then there are no war criminals.

Hitchens proved with documents and facts that Kissinger was personally
responsible for the death of 350 thousand Laotians, 600 thousand Cambodians
and 600 thousand Vietnamese. Due to his assistance in repression in Pakistan
(Bangladesh) Kissinger is guilty in the death of 3 million people more. His
role in the events connected with the occupation of East Timor by Indonesia
in 1975 allows to accuse him of the death of 200 thousand people more. The
sum total is almost 5 million lives. Pinochet’s victims in Chile after the
coup inspired by Nixon and Kissinger can not be compared with the figures
mentioned above. Hitchens believes that Kissinger could be arrested in
several countries at once after Pinochet was detained in England in 1998.

Hitchens describes the facts which took place at the end of 1998 when
Kissinger was coming to power. Nixon was struggling with acting
vice-president Hubert Humphrey for the position of the President at that
time. It was the time when President Johnson was striving for the regulation
of the Vietnamese war in Paris. The agreement seemed to be inevitable:
Johnston would stop bombing North Vietnam, the troops from Vietnam’s South
would be called off. It goes without saying it would be a perfect trump card
for the administration of “democrats” and personally – for Humphrey. So
Kissinger and other members of Nixon’s tea started trying to win that trump
card over to their side. The sense of their actions was as follows: to make
one of the parties of Paris negotiations – South Vietnam junta – reject any
variants of the peaceful outcome. Violating the US laws, Kissinger and others
assured spokesmen for the junta that they would get something better from the
Republican administration. Kissinger himself was silent about that role of
his in those intrigues in his memoirs. Nixon let the cat out of the bag.
Clark Clifford who was taking the position of the US Defense Minister
characterized Kissinger’s actions (and the actions of Nixon’s other
followers) as “rough, illegal interference in the national security affairs
on the part of natural persons”.

The South Vietnamese junta broke the negotiations successfully and Johnson,
Humphrey found themselves in the difficult situation. Nixon used that failure
rather actively in his pre-election campaign and won. In 4 years Nixon and
Kissinger signed peaceful agreement on similar conditions. The “delay” cost
1.5 million human lives but it was Kissinger who was…awarded the Nobel Prize
(?!). The American authorities are not likely to deliver Kissinger but this
person is already on trial in mass media and among the people. Below are 2
most impressive statements on the matter which may serve a key for
understanding the roots of the growing movement against capitalist
globalization in the world.

Edward S. Herman, Professor Emeritus at the Wharton School, University of
Pennsylvania:
The "secret bombing" of Cambodia by the Nixon-Kissinger gang
may have killed as many Cambodians as were executed by the Khmer Rouge and
surely contributed to the ferocity of Khmer Rouge behavior toward the urban
elite and citizenry whose leaders had allied themselves with the foreign
terrorists… Henry Kissinger's role in the Cambodian genocide, Chile, and East
Timor, makes him a first class war criminal, arguably at least in the class
of Hitler's Foreign Minister Joachim Von Ribbentrop, hanged in 1946.

Boston Phoenix: Hitchens explication of the Nuremberg precedent, and of the
legal responsibility established for high government officials who preside
over misdeeds, is particularly impressive and disturbing. But what Hitchens
fails to deal with adequately is that Kissinger was never close to being
alone in his illegal foreign intrigues. John F. Kennedy attempted to
assassinate Fidel Castro… Lyndon Johnson used a trumped-up naval incident to
trick Congress into passing the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, … Ronald Reagan,
who is honored in ways that Nixon will never be, illegally funded wars marked
by human-rights abuses against the people of Nicaragua and El Salvador.
Clinton used the military for humanitarian purposes… Donald Rumsfeld, who
feuded with Kissinger during the Ford years because he thought Kissinger was
soft on the Soviets, is back in power, pushing an unworkable missile defense
on our uneasy allies…. Hitchens is right to stress Kissinger’s personal
responsibility. But as Fallows suggests, the fault lies not just in
Kissinger, but also in ourselves.

So what are the hopes left to the humankind if the globalization will bring
such immoral politicians as Kissinger to supremacy in the world?


Reply via email to