_______   ____   ______
  /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //    M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
 / /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\         Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\�            http://www.MiddleEast.Org 
                                       
  News, Information, & Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups, 
         and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know! 
                              --------------------------
          IF YOU DON'T GET MER, YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!        
     To receive MER regularly email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




UPCOMING FROM MER -  The Washington Scene:
       Arab-Americans Abused and Contained By "Client Organizations" - ADC and AAI 
topping the list


                                 "We have no response to make to you. 
                                 We don't want to get into a discussion 
                                 on this ... In fact we'd rather not say 
                                 anything about this at all."  
                                                        CNN Spokesman

MID-EAST REALITIES - MER - www.MiddleEast.Org - 9/03/2001
Thirty years ago most of the area now known as Gilo was part of the Palestinian town 
of Beit Jala, next to Bethlehem.  Gilo has been built from scratch across the "Green 
Line" in areas Israel occupied at the time of the 1967 war.   In the past three 
decades Israel has followed a basic and sustained policy of Arab dispossession and 
Jewish building.  It has done so at the barrel of a gun.  This is what the military 
occupation is really all about -- taking from the Arabs and giving to Israeli Jews, 
many emigrating from abroad.  And this is why when it comes to Gilo there is no 
question that the Palestinians have the right to contest what the Israelis have done 
and that journalists using the term "illegal settlement" are doing precisely what they 
are supposed to do, telling others what is really going on with context and historical 
awareness.    As for CNN, the network of Larry King (major promoter of Israeli 
interests on and off camera) and Wolf Blitzer (formerly of and planted by the 
Israeli/Jewish lobby in Washington), for all of its pretensions and foreign accents 
its an American network just like PBS catering to the extraordinary pressures and 
biases that result in the U.S. usually standing alone with Israel against the rest of 
the world, not to mention all the American money and arms that make it possible for 
the Israelis to do what they do...Gilo included.



              CNN CAVES IN TO ISRAEL OVER ITS REFERENCES TO ILLEGAL SETTLEMENTS
                                            By Robert Fisk, Middle East Correspondent 

[The Independent, UK, 3 September 2001]    Just as the BBC last month ordered its 
reporters to use the phrase "targeted killings'' for Israel's assassination of 
Palestinians, CNN � under constant attack from right-wing Jewish pro-settler lobby 
groups � has instructed its journalists to stop referring to Gilo as a "Jewish 
settlement''. Instead, they must call the settlement, built illegally on occupied Arab 
land outside Jerusalem, "a Jewish neighbourhood". 

Arabs have long protested over CNN's reporting of the Middle East � especially its 
pejorative use of the word "terrorist'' � but they are likely to be outraged by this 
latest "softening" of the station's reporting in Israel's favour. Some of the land on 
which Gilo is built was taken from the Palestinians of Beit Jala � Gilo is Hebrew for 
Jala � but no hint of this historical background will be permitted on CNN. Israeli 
soldiers in Gilo have been involved in nightly battles with Palestinian gunmen in Beit 
Jala. 

The instruction from CNN's headquarters in Atlanta is straightforward. "We refer to 
Gilo as 'a Jewish neighbourhood on the outskirts of Jerusalem, built on land occupied 
by Israel in 1967','' the order states. "We don't refer to it as a settlement.'' 

This extraordinary climbdown in favour of the Israelis follows months of internal 
debate in CNN, which has been constantly criticised by CNN Watch,
honestreporting.com and other pro-Israeli pressure groups in the United States which 
monitor all its reports on the Middle East. 

Many journalists at CNN headquarters are angered by the new instruction. "There's a 
feeling by some people here that what we are doing is searching for euphemisms for 
what is really happening," one of them told The Independent yesterday. "We've managed 
to eliminate the word 'terrorism' � we now talk about 'militants' � because we know 
that the word 'terrorist' is used by one side or another to damage the other side. But 
now there's pressure on us not to use the word 'settler' in any context � but to just 
refer to the settlers as 'Israelis'." 

In the past, CNN used "terrorist" only about Arabs � the Israeli settler who murdered 
29 Palestinians in a Hebron mosque in 1994 was always called an "extremist" on CNN � 
and at one point described Arab protests at the illegal settlements built by Jews on 
Palestinian land as "conflicting heritage" claims. 

However, by censoring the word "settlement" for Gilo, CNN is perpetrating a lie. Gilo 
was illegally annexed by Israel after the 1967 war � not just "occupied" as CNN wishes 
its viewers to believe � and far from being a "neighbourhood on the outskirts of 
Jerusalem", it was built on land which Israel � again illegally � used to extend the 
boundaries of Jerusalem. 

"There has been an intense internal debate over the use of words," the CNN reporter 
said. "And sometimes we still do use the word 'settlement' about Gilo. In fact, we 
don't necessarily say all that stuff about 'occupied by Israel in 1967'. But we're 
having problems. There are many small pro-settler Jewish groups who're trying to win 
the war of words." 

A CNN spokesman in Atlanta said last night: "We have no response to make to you. We 
don't want to get into a discussion on this ... In fact we'd rather not say anything 
about this at all." 

* Israeli soldiers killed two Palestinians in gun battles in the West Bank city of 
Hebron yesterday, creating a violent backdrop for the arrival of the European Union's 
foreign policy representative, Javier Solana. He was due to help lay the groundwork 
for a meeting between the Palestinian President, Yasser Arafat, and Israel's Foreign 
Minister, Shimon Peres, which might be held in Italy at the end of the week. 
  


  
[AND A COMMENT about this latest CNN "enforcement action" from a Canadian reader]:

Dear CNN:

Since the beginning of the Palestinian intifada, against the Israeli military 
occupation, almost a year ago, the Zionist-controlled mainstream media has been a 
shameful platform for whitewashing Israeli belligerence. This by 1) Using euphemisms; 
2) Selective reporting (of incidents or pertinent information, including omitting the 
historical context); 3) Injecting factual errors into the reports (Zionist myths); 4) 
Implementing lexical apartheid (selective use of repulsive words to describe 
Palestinians and/or their actions (militants, terrorists, and so forth) while using 
plausible descriptions for Israelis; and last but not least 5) Forced publishing of 
pro-Israeli articles. The CNN, has been a pioneer in succumbing to expediential 
pro-Israeli
articles in the USA.

Closer to (my) home, the National Post holds that shameful post. (Senior editors at 
Aspers� CanWest publications - owners of two thirds of Canadian media outlets - were 
ordered in August to run a strongly worded pro-Israeli editorial on Saturday op-ed 
page.)

Let�s imagine for a millisecond that we would refer to Kuwait as "disputed area" 
(between Iraq and Kuwait) and, listen to US spokespersons ask both sides to "show 
restraint" while Sadam does to the Kuwaitis what Israel is doing to the Palestinians 
now. 

But in Israel, it is somehow okay to call what the UN body equally considers occupied 
territories, the Jewish colonies (again euphemized as settlements), "disputed".

Would the CNN then call Iraq�s new colonies in Kuwait "Iraqi neighborhoods"? Somehow, 
its okay to refer to the colony of Gilo, for example, in the occupied territories, as 
"neighborhood". 

Iraq declares that Kuwait is its capital. Would the CNN list it as the capital of Iraq 
with a barely noticeable fine print saying that it is a contentious issue? (What 
happened when Iraq declared Kuwait as an Iraqi (19th) province?) 

Were the Kuwaitis fighting off the occupation labeled as terrorists/militants? 

It seems to me that the CNN news reporters also need to start an intifiada against the 
Zionist dominance. And, it seems for a minute, alas, that the Palestinians cannot gain 
their freedom before the Americans do. 

                Regards,
                Baha Abu-Shaqra 


                                    ----------------------------------
            MiD-EasT RealitieS  -  http://www.MiddleEast.Org
                              Phone:  202 362-5266    
                              Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                              Fax: 815 366-0800


To subscribe email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject SUBSCRIBE
To unsubscribe email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject UNSUBSCRIBE




Reply via email to