At 8:59 AM -0700 3/8/06, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Wed, Mar 08, 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: : +> : +> Since we abandoned MAN[1-9]. The fact that many old Makefiles : +> still use NO_MAN doesn't make it right; NO_MAN is a user knob, : +> not a Makefile knob (same distinction as between WITH_FOO and : +> USE_FOO in the ports tree). : : Fair enough. Maybe we should fix NO_MAN= uses, so it doesn't : create confusion?Seems like a reasonable thing to do. Cut and paste copying of bad examples is a big source of bogusness in our tree...
If we fix this in some makefiles in -current, should we also (eventually) MFC the changes back into RELENG_6? Or is it only an issue for -current? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Systems Programmer or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
