Daniel Gerzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
da> Then we can tell the same about the whole MAC and Audit chapters, da> since they seem a lot more advanced and tricky to me than NanoBSD. Not the same. Again, what I wanted to mean is that it is not a typical installation/building method for users who read a chapter for normal installation in Handbook. I did not mean by the word "advanced" it is difficult to understand or simply complex, so I showed multi-os and fbsd-from-scratch as examples. They are actually useful configurations but not topics which Handbook has to cover in detail, and I think they are ones which users should read *after* Handbook. Mixing these two sort of topics often makes Handbook's structure complex. A lot of information at one place is not always good. da> The FreeBSD project is known as a very well documented Operating da> System. As far as I've been working with FreeBSD and seeking for da> documentation and more information about things I wanted to try da> out, the first place I've looked at was our great Handbok. I feel da> that having documentation at one place is more comfortable than da> googling it for XY minutes. I cannot agree with this sort of ideas. The FAQ was created based on a idea "all of useful Q&A in a book", but we have not been able to maintain it well actually, for example. -- | Hiroki SATO
pgp0S5Xv29aoH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
