Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The funny fact is that now sshd(8) behaves consistently, and it's > partly due to my change. [...]
FWIW, although I was either too busy or too distracted to review Yar's patch when he submitted it in March: as the maintainer of both PAM and OpenSSH, I believe the patch is correct and I approve of Yar's commit. He has simply modified pam_unix(8) to behave in accordance with what was already documented in pw(8), long after OpenSSH was modified (by the vendor) to do so when not using PAM. I don't see that there's anything to argue about. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"