Yar Tikhiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The funny fact is that now sshd(8) behaves consistently, and it's
> partly due to my change.  [...]

FWIW, although I was either too busy or too distracted to review Yar's
patch when he submitted it in March: as the maintainer of both PAM and
OpenSSH, I believe the patch is correct and I approve of Yar's commit.
He has simply modified pam_unix(8) to behave in accordance with what
was already documented in pw(8), long after OpenSSH was modified (by
the vendor) to do so when not using PAM.  I don't see that there's
anything to argue about.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to