On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 05:07:45PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I must confess I don't really see the point of this change. Yes, people > > can write rc.d scripts instead, but not (by far) as easily as they can > > add a line or two to rc.early. > > > > If the problem is that rc.early is sourced by early.sh which is sourced > > by rc, simply rename early.sh to early so it runs in a subshell instead. > > Doug, any chance you can back out your change and apply to have > src/etc/rc.d/early.sh renamed to src/etc/rc.d/early instead?
Whatever we end up doing just an FYI that the reason it's a .sh script is because it was sourced directly into the pre-rc.d /etc/rc. If we change it to be sourced in a sub-shell we will break rc.early scripts that define/modify environment variables that later scripts depend on. Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://people.freebsd.org/~mtm/mtm.asc mmakonnen @ gmail.com | AC7B 5672 2D11 F4D0 EBF8 5279 5359 2B82 7CD4 1F55 mtm @ FreeBSD.Org | FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"