SЬren Schmidt wrote:
>   Modified files:
>     sys/dev/ata          ata-pci.c
>   Log:
>   Fix treating some modern chips (mem mapped) as legacy devices.

Hi, SЬren.

Seems that PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MASTERDEV, PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MODEPRIM and
PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MODESEC should be related to the PCIS_STORAGE_IDE
subclass. My Marvell 88SE6141 chip have PCIS_STORAGE_SATA subclass and
PCIP_STORAGE_SATA_AHCI_1_0|PCIS_STORAGE_OTHER programming interface.
And this chip detected as a legacy controller. What you think about
the attached patch?

--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
--- /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.c      2007-10-29 08:01:06.000000000 +0300
+++ ata-pci.c   2007-10-29 08:11:20.000000000 +0300
@@ -59,15 +59,17 @@
 int
 ata_legacy(device_t dev)
 {
-    return (((pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_PROGIF, 
1)&PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MASTERDEV)&&
-            ((pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_PROGIF, 1) &
-              (PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MODEPRIM | PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MODESEC)) !=
+    uint32_t pi, scc;
+    pi = pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_PROGIF, 1);
+    scc = pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_SUBCLASS, 1);
+    return ((scc == PCIS_STORAGE_IDE && (pi & PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MASTERDEV) &&
+           ((pi & (PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MODEPRIM | PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MODESEC)) !=
              (PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MODEPRIM | PCIP_STORAGE_IDE_MODESEC))) ||
-           (!pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_BAR(0), 4) &&
-            !pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_BAR(1), 4) &&
-            !pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_BAR(2), 4) &&
-            !pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_BAR(3), 4) &&
-            !pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_BAR(5), 4)));
+           (pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_BAR(0), 4) == 0 &&
+            pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_BAR(1), 4) == 0 &&
+            pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_BAR(2), 4) == 0 &&
+            pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_BAR(3), 4) == 0 &&
+            pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_BAR(5), 4) == 0));
 }
 
 int
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to