David Rothenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't think it's done through newlib headers. That was my thought > initially, too, when I was investigating the patch problem, but I > did run gcc -E on some source and the result still called fdopen.
Good, I was beginning to wonder ;-). After all users are allowed to declare ISO-C functions themself without actually including any headers [*], so just re-defining stuff in the headers wouldn't work. [*] Of course doing so is not good practice, as users are going to do it wrong, but that's not the point. benny