PROBLEM tcm On 2003-01-27T12:16+0100, Daniel Bößwetter wrote: ) TCM 2.20 has been released last week (see ) http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~tcm/) and I have made source and binary ) packages for Cygwin now. At ) ) http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/tcm_cygwin.html
This package expands into usr/share/doc/Cygwin/tcm-2.20.README and then a bunch of things under usr/X11R6/ (usr/X11R6/doc/tcm-2.20/*, usr/X11R6/man/man1/*, usr/X11R6/bin/*, and usr/X11R6/share/tcm-2.20/*). This package has been pending for a *long* time, but I think I should ask: Should it be reviewed by cygwin-xfree instead of cygwin-apps? http://cygwin.com/setup.html does not mention placing binaries in any location other than usr/bin/*, and at least one package has been redirected from the cygwin-apps track to cygwin-xfree recently: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00043.html If this does fall under cygwin-apps since it is not an "X package" but a "package that requires X", should the package be recreated with prefix set to /usr instead of /usr/X11R6? Either way, should there be a section in setup.html about Cygwin packages that depend on Cygwin/XFree86, but are not part of Cygwin/XFree86? -- Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://naim-users.org/nmlorg/ http://naim.n.ml.org/ It is so easy to miss pretty trivial solutions to problems deemed complicated. The goal of a scientist is to find an interesting problem, and live off it for a while. The goal of an engineer is to evade interesting problems :) -- Vadim Antonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on NANOG