On Apr 15 12:49, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hi, > > Corinna Vinschen, le Sat 15 Apr 2006 11:29:39 +0200, a écrit : > > However, since the Cygwin environment tries to resemble a POSIX > > environment, I'm wondering if it wouldn't make sense to add > > [libusb-config] from the libusb package to the Cygwin port of this > > package. What do you think? > > This makes sense indeed. I copied and corrected libusb's libusb-config > script. > > > Oh and I forgot this one: Since libusb.a provides dynamic linking, > > it would be more correct to name the library libusb.dll.a. Since > > it doesn't provide a static lib as the Linux version does, that's > > not that important, but I thought I should mention it. > > Corrected too. > > An updated packaging is available at > > http://brl.thefreecat.org/libusb-win32/ > http://brl.thefreecat.org/libusb-win32/libusb-win32-0.1.10.1-3-src.tar.bz2 > http://brl.thefreecat.org/libusb-win32/libusb-win32-0.1.10.1-3.tar.bz2 > http://brl.thefreecat.org/libusb-win32/setup.hint
Cool, thanks. Uploaded. Please announce. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat