From: Harold L Hunt II <huntharo at msu dot edu>:


DDD can work with LessTif, but you have to tell it that you want it to be compile for LessTif, and you may have to find a better distribution of the source than you have now (one with more recent patches for the LessTif support). The following are useful (I googled for "DDD LessTif"):

http://rsusu1.rnd.runnet.ru/cgi-bin/info2html?(ddd)LessTif

Interesting link, but problem still there. ;-((
I don't understand why DDD wants Motif 2.1, althouht its configuration
is reporting "GNU/LessTif Version 2.1 Release 0.93.91" ?
Some details follow:


bt08pm: /usr/X11R6/include/Xm/ ddd --lesstif-version 93
Warning: This DDD requires a Motif 2.1 library (using Motif -1617156.-609)
Continue at own risk.
Warning: No type converter registered for 'String' to 'Orientation' conversion.
Warning: No type converter registered for 'String' to 'Orientation' conversion.
Warning: No type converter registered for 'String' to 'Orientation' conversion.


Internal error (Segmentation fault).

Although:

bt08pm: /usr/bin/  ddd --configuration
  GNU DDD 3.3.8 (i686-pc-cygwin)
  Copyright (C) 1995-1999 Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany.
  Copyright (C) 1999-2001 Universität Passau, Germany.
  Copyright (C) 2001 Universität des Saarlandes, Germany.

Compiled with GCC 3.2 20020927 (prerelease)
Requires X11R6, Xt11R6, Motif 2.1 (GNU/LessTif Version 2.1 Release 0.93.91)
Includes XPM 3.4.11, Athena Panner (7000002L), DDD core
Built 2003-11-14 by goethald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.


And indeed <Xm/Xm.h> report this same release:

/usr/X11R6/include/Xm/Xm.h:#define LESSTIF_VERSION 0
/usr/X11R6/include/Xm/Xm.h:#define LESSTIF_REVISION 93
/usr/X11R6/include/Xm/Xm.h:#define LesstifVersion (LESSTIF_VERSION * 1000 + LESSTIF_REVISION)
/usr/X11R6/include/Xm/Xm.h:#define LesstifVERSION_STRING "@(#)GNU/LessTif Version 2.1 Release 0.93.91"
/usr/X11R6/include/Xm/Xm.h:#define XmVERSION_STRING LesstifVERSION_STRING


http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ddd/2003-06/msg00009.html

No help from that link :-(



Hope that helps,

Harold




Reply via email to