On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 05:36:41PM +0100, Tommy Pettersson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:10:43AM -0500, David Roundy wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2008 9:59 AM, Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, me too. And perhaps it should be renamed to > > > --external-merger to reflect it does no longer perform a merge, > > > but only selects the merger to use. > > > > I definitely prefer the name --external-merge, or perhaps > > --external-merge-conflicts. The problem is that merger is a noun, not > > a verb. > > Hm, being a noun was actually my point to why I felt it was a > better name for an option telling what external merger to use. > But I'm not a native English speaker, so my preferences may be > very wrong :-), and changing the name of an option can have > other bad implications.
Right, my grammar mistake. But merger does not mean "something that merges" as eater would mean "something that eats", but rather "an act or instance of merging." -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
