On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:10:43AM -0500, David Roundy wrote: > On Jan 17, 2008 9:59 AM, Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, me too. And perhaps it should be renamed to > > --external-merger to reflect it does no longer perform a merge, > > but only selects the merger to use. > > I definitely prefer the name --external-merge, or perhaps > --external-merge-conflicts. The problem is that merger is a noun, not > a verb.
Hm, being a noun was actually my point to why I felt it was a better name for an option telling what external merger to use. But I'm not a native English speaker, so my preferences may be very wrong :-), and changing the name of an option can have other bad implications. -- Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
