Le Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 09:19:44AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > Any reason not to fix the FTBFS in the old version
Not really, apart that if it is fixed in the new upstream version it is a few dozens of minutes of work spent for not a big benefit (provided that the update to 2.2 is not postponed too long). <private life> I am looking for new accomodation those days, so the time I can spend on constructive work is temporarly more than halved. </private life> I have looked at the diff between versions 2.2 and 2.0, and it is not so big. Also, there is nothing that looks like a gcc-4.3 fix. What shall we do? - Fix in 2.0, - Update to 2.2 now without the java stuff (trivial), and fix later, - Update to 2.2 without the java stuff, and fix that version, - Wait for a full 2.2 package for fixing. Have a nice day, -- Charles soon in $somewhere, Kanagawa, Japan