On Thu, Oct 09 2008, Frank Küster wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
>> There is not point keeping this report open
> There is.
Err, I don't see the point.
>>; the official kernel
>> team produces headers that do not work with kernel-package.
>
> Then this is a bug in kernel-package.
Heck no. If the official kernels, which do not use
kernel-package, produce header packages that are not usable with a
package that predates their effort, how is it a bug in kernel-package?
> You're free to decide that you won't fix it, and not even document the
> fact. But it is still a bug, and I hope that you are at least willing
> to fix the clone, i.e. the missing documentation. If you tell me that
> you are, I'll be happy to provide a patch.
I don't see why I have to report that a third party produced
header package is not compatible with kernel-package.
I assert, again, that this is not a bug.
I'll remove hints from the documentation that imply that there
could be link to the official kernels.
manoj
--
To keep your friends treat them kindly; to kill them, treat them often.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
