On Fri, 14, Jan, 2011 at 02:05:29PM +0100, Philipp Kern spoke thus.. > David, > > am Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 07:55:40AM -0400 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > Of course, if someone can duplicate the bug running a 32-bit kernel that > > changes things. I still think we probably need a powerpc64 porterbox if > > powerpc is going to continue as a release architecture post squeeze. > > I lobbied hard to get ppc64 buildds at all. Now we have three: porpora, > poulenc and praetorius. As porpora and poulenc are identical Apple XServe G5, > and given that we still have the slow voltaire as a ppc32 around, it might > make > sense to get one of the two to be a ppc porterbox with 64bit kernel. > > I don't know if porterboxes are possible at that location, however. Thus > Cc'ing d-admin and the local admin.
Unlikely we can make that a publically accessible porterbox I'm afraid. I'd have to talk to networks at the University but I'm not sure they'd be happy with it. I'll ask though. Mark -- Mark Hymers <mhy at debian dot org> "But Yossarian *still* didn't understand either how Milo could buy eggs in Malta for seven cents apiece and sell them at a profit in Pianosa for five cents." Catch 22, Joseph Heller -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org