Your message dated Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:28:35 +0000
with message-id
<cam8zjqvycwkjtgxqdcfyumwkwsdhvfk51rfc9hkz_w22i-j...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1055922: rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055922,
regarding rmatrix: ABI change in Matrix 1.6-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1055922: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055922
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rmatrix
Version: 1.6-2-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org
Hi Dirk
I'm opening this bug as a place for discussion and to track the
affected packages. It can be closed once rmatrix and its
reverse-dependencies are ready to migrate.
I've copied your email to the debian-r mailing list [1] below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2023/11/msg00033.html
Package Matrix is having a new and energetic maintainer/contributor in Mikael
Jagan who is tidying up a few loose corners (and inter alia sent me a patch
to RcppEigen that resulted in a coordinated CRAN update of RcppEigen, lme4,
and OpenMx).
Mikael also identified two sets of packages needed a rebuild in messages to
the r-package-devel list (the more-or-less official place in the R Project to
ask / discuss package changes, it is a decent to be on) following private
mails between him and me. See
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2023q4/010051.html
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2023q4/010054.html
The first concerns packages using a LinkingTo: Matrix and building against
Matrix _headers_. The second concerns caching of S4 signatures (which bit us
at work because of SeuratObject [not in Debian] and how I got onto this).
Most of these are not in Debian but I think we need binary rebuilds of
irlba because of headers
OpenMx because of headers, a new upstream 2.21.10 is out too
TMB because of headers
MatrixModels because of S4 caching
I would appreciate it if someone could tickle rebuilds. To me a quick
informal touch of debian/changelog would do; if someone thinks this needs a
formal transition go for it.
The R Core team and the CRAN maintainers are aware of the implicit problem
with signalling the need for binary rebuilds. They are discussing this, but
do not have an answer. Historically, CRAN has informally rebuilt its binaries
for windows and macOS, but that of course does not help binary distributors
such as us, other Linux distros, Conda, r2u, ... at all.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing now because there's nothing to be done in rmatrix.
The remaining regressions seen are caused by unrelated uploads of
r-cran-seurat/r-cran-seuratobject on 2023-11-01 and
r-cran-rstan/r-cran-rstanarm on 2023-10-27 which have not yet
migrated.
--- End Message ---
