On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:28:29AM +0800, Isaac To wrote: > >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Daniel> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > And > >> Nikita just pointed out there's libc6-i686. It might make sense to > >> add > linux-i686 too. I'm open for discussing that, but this > >> discussion doesn't > belong on the ITP bug. > >> > >> And why is it only for 2.6 kernels? The processor specific package > >> should support NPTL, and it doesn't require 2.6... > > Daniel> That sentence is contradictory - NPTL requires 2.6. > > Unless one patch the kernel to support all the things like .<pid> files in > /proc, futex, O(1) scheduler, ... (i.e., as in the "2.4" kernel of Redhat).
Certainly. I've got no intention of supporting that in the debian glibc packages, however. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer