On mer., 2010-05-26 at 08:29 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > It is not about whether dash can handle it or not. The bashisms > don't come > > from autoconf, the come from what the author's added to > configure.in{,.in}. > > I beg to differ, at least some of them don't come from configure.*. > One > example is > http://people.debian.org/~geissert/source-bashisms/evolution_2.30.1.2-2.dsc > where I can't really fine the >&$3 call (nor any >& for that matter) in the > configure.* files.
Ok, sorry, didn't see earlier in the thread that it was a false positive. Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part